This is because the Trobrianders are matrilineal children belong to the clan of their mother and not of their father. In other words, although an individual may be prohibited from marrying or having sexual relations with many people, different sexual relations may be prohibited for different reasons, and with different penalties.įor example, Trobriand Islanders prohibit both sexual relations between a man and his mother, and between a woman and her father, but they describe these prohibitions in very different ways: relations between a man and his mother fall within the category of forbidden relations among members of the same clan relations between a woman and her father do not. This excerpt also suggests that the relationship between sexual and marriage practices is complex, and that societies distinguish between different sorts of prohibitions. In short, anthropologists were not studying "incest" per se they were asking informants what they meant by "incest," and what the consequences of "incest" were, in order to map out social relationships within the community. It should also be noted that in these theories anthropologists are primarily concerned with marriage rules and not sexual behavior. Moreover, the definition restricts itself to sexual intercourse this does not mean that other forms of sexual contact do not occur, or are proscribed, or prescribed. It should be further noted that in these theories anthropologists are generally concerned solely with brother-sister incest, and are not claiming that all forms of incest are taboo (these theories are further complicated by the fact that in many societies people related to one another in different ways, and sometimes distantly, are classified together as siblings). What penalties fall on (a) the individuals concerned (b) the community as a whole? Are such penalties enforced by authority, or are they believed to ensure automatically by all action of supernatural force? Is there any correlation between the severity of the penalty and the nearness of the blood-tie of the partners in guilt? Should children be born as the result of incestuous unions, how are they treated? Are there any methods, ritual or legal, by which persons who fall within the prohibited degrees and wish to marry can break the relationship and become free to marry?Īs this excerpt suggests, anthropologists are interested in the gulf between cultural rules and actual behavior, and many ethnographers have observed that incest occurs in societies with prohibitions against incest. In some societies unions with certain persons related by affinity are also considered incestuous. The more usual practice is that unions with certain relatives only are considered incestuous, the relationships being regulated by the type of descent emphasized. The prohibition may be so narrow as to include only one type of parent-child relationship (though this is very rare), or those within the elementary family or so wide as to include all with whom genealogical or classificatory kinship can be traced. The rules regulating incest must be investigated in every society by means of the Genealogical Method. There is no uniformity as to which degrees are involved in the prohibitions. The two prohibitions do not necessarily coincide. In every society there are rules prohibiting incestuous unions, both as to sexual intercourse and recognized marriage. Incest is sexual intercourse between individuals related in certain prohibited degrees of kinship. The following excerpt from Notes and Queries, the most well-established field manual for ethnographic research, illustrates the scope of ethnographic investigation into the matter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |